Table 3.
Escallonia species | Ploidy group | Analyzed plant numbers | NSL (cm) | NSIL (cm) | BL (cm) | BIL (cm) | Axillary budburst (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. illinita | D | 6 | 11.0 ± 4.5NS | 1.0 ± 0.2*** | 23.6 ± 2.6* | 1.4 ± 0.1* | 15.6 ± 2.0** |
T | 23 | 11.4 ± 2.4 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 20.1 ± 2.9 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 18.0 ± 2.3 | |
E. rosea | D | 4 | 3.8 ± 2.8*** | 0.3 ± 0.1*** | 6.8 ± 2.2*** | 0.4 ± 0.1*** | 93.1 ± 10.3** |
T | 6 | 1.3 ± 1.2 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 2.0 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 85.1 ± 15.2 | |
E. rubra | D | 16 | 4.9 ± 4.3* | 0.4 ± 0.3*** | 8.2 ± 2.1*** | 0.6 ± 0.1*** | 81.5 ± 17.0** |
T | 23 | 5.5 ± 3.9 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 8.6 ± 2.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 76.2 ± 16.7 |
Statistical analysis within the genotype between diploids and tetraploids with MWUT for pairwise comparison, except for NSL and NSIL of E. illinita and E. rubra, a T-test for pairwise comparison was used.
, Not significant;
p = 0.05;
p = 0.01;
p = 0.001.