Table 5.

Outcome of population‐level Mantel tests correlations between phenotypes and AFLP, MS‐AFLP Field, and MS‐AFLP common garden profiles and the geographical distance

Phenotype field	AFLP		MS‐AFLP Field		Geographical distance
	r	p‐Value	r	p‐Value	r	p‐Value
Biomass Index	.46	.04	.13	.26	.22	.08
Inflorescence height	−.23	.88	.17	.27	−.12	.74
No. of inflorescences	−.11	.68	−.19	.79	−.04	.53
No. of flowers	.02	.35	−.06	.64	.05	.27

Phenotype common garden	AFLP		MS‐AFLP Common garden		Geographical distance
	r	p‐Value	r	p‐Value	r	p‐Value
Biomass Index	.48	.003	−.24	.79	.37	.01
Inflorescence height	.33	.04	−.28	.81	.25	.06
No. of inflorescences	.42	.02	−.13	.72	.04	.35
No. of flowers	.33	.04	.04	.36	.003	.41
Flowering time	.03	.33	−.01	.62	.03	.41
Total biomass	.57	.003	−.27	.85	.48	.002

Field traits were only tested with MS‐AFLP data from field‐grown plants and common garden traits were only tested with MS‐AFLP data from common garden‐grown plants. Correlations and p‐Values were derived from 1,500 permutations. Bold values indicate a p‐Value <.05.