Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 28;10(3):103. doi: 10.3390/toxins10030103

Table 1.

Participant characteristics by domoic acid exposure group.

Variables Entire Sample (n = 60) Exposure: Target Week Exposure: Past Year
High
(n = 27)
Low
(n = 33)
p Value High
(n = 30)
Low
(n = 30)
p Value
Demographics
Age, year 0.17 a 0.31 a
 Median [Q1, Q2] 42 [30, 55.25] 38 [29, 55] 49 [30, 56] 41 [30.25, 54.75] 44 [30, 55.75]
Gender, n(%) 0.68 b 0.79 b
 Female 34 (56.67) 14 (51.85) 20 (60.61) 16 (53.33) 18 (60)
 Male 26 (43.33) 13 (48.15) 13 (39.39) 14 (46.67) 12 (40)
Education, n(%) 0.71 c 0.37 c
 >/=High School 40 (66.67) 18 (66.67) 22 (66.67) 20 (66.67) 20 (66.67)
 <High School 15 (25) 6 (22.22) 9 (27.27) 6 (20) 9 (30)
 Missing 5 (8.33) 3 (11.11) 2 (6.06) 4 (13.33) 1 (3.33)
Outcome measures
EM (Everyday Memory) Score 0.003 a,* 0.01 a,*
 Median [Q1, Q2] 3 [0, 8] 4 [3, 9.5] 1 [0, 4] 4 [3, 10.25] 1.5 [0, 3.75]
EM Score Median Split, n(%) 0.01 b,* 0.01 b,*
 High 27 (45) 18 (66.67) 9 (27.27) 19 (63.33) 8 (26.67)
 Low 33 (55) 9 (33.33) 24 (72.73) 11 (36.67) 22 (73.33)
EM Problems, n(%) 0.02 b,* 0.12 b
 1 or more 31 (51.67) 19 (70.37) 12 (36.36) 19 (63.33) 12 (40)
 None 29 (48.33) 8 (29.63) 21 (63.64) 11 (36.67) 18 (60)

a Mann–Whitney U test, b Chi-squared test, c Fisher’s exact test; * p value < 0.05.