Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 5;45(2):118–127. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.00360

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical data of the 72 cases analyzed in this study

Characteristic Cavity resurfacing Contracture release Facial hair restoration Skin coverage Combined group Total
No. of cases 10 13 19 17 13 72
Mean age (yr) 42.1 ± 15.1 23 ± 9.3 25.2 ± 16.6 45 ± 16 29 ± 3.6 33.7 ± 15.6
Sex (male:female) 7:3 6:7 14:5 13:4 8:5 48:24
Defect etiology
 Trauma 5 1 5 7 0 19
 Burn 0 12 12 0 13 37
 Tumor excision 5 0 0 9 0 14
 Exposed hardware 0 0 0 1 0 1
 Congenital 0 0 1 0 0 1
Defect site
 Malar region 0 0 0 3 0 3
 Infraorbial region 0 0 0 5 0 5
 Nose 0 0 0 1 0 1
 Palate 2 0 0 0 0 2
 Eyelid 0 13 0 8 13 34
 Eyebrow 0 0 14 0 13 27
 Beard 0 0 2 0 0 2
 Mustache 0 0 3 0 0 3
 Orbit 4 0 0 0 0 4
 Orbit and malar region 2 0 0 0 0 2
 Orbit with eyelid 2 0 0 0 0 2
Flap composition
 Fasciocutaneos 0 13 19 17 13 62
 Fascial 4 0 0 0 0 4
 Fasciocutaneos with fascial extention 4 0 0 0 0 4
 Osteofascial 2 0 0 0 0 2
Mean flap size (cm²)
 Skin paddle 5.5 × 2 3.6 × 0.5 5.6 × 3 7.4 × 3.3 1.6 × 3.4
 Fasciaa) 18.8 × 2.1 18.8 × 2.1
 Bone 6 × 3.5 6 × 3.5
Complications
 Infection 1 0 0 1 0 2
 Dehiscence 1 0 2 0 1 3
 Partial flap loss 0 0 1 0 0 1
 Patchy hair loss 0 0 1 2 1 4
  Ectropion 0 2 0 0 0 2
  Lagophthalmos 0 1 0 0 0 1
a)

Fascial size was considered (measured) only in fascial flaps and fasciocutaneous flaps with a fascial extension.