Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 26;6(2):e00386. doi: 10.1002/prp2.386

Table 4.

Conjugating enzyme‐miRNA pair correlations consistent with miRNA modulation of conjugating enzyme gene expression in response to rifampin treatment

miRNA Gene 2 Correlation coefficienta P‐value
Positive correlation
hsa‐miR‐638 GSTT1 .99 .0004
hsa‐miR‐766 GSTT1 .96 .003
hsa‐miR‐92a UGT1A9 .93 .007
hsa‐miR‐335 GSTCD .93 .007
hsa‐miR‐342‐3p GSTA4 .93 .007
hsa‐miR‐92a UGT2B11 .89 .012
hsa‐miR‐92a UGT2B7 .89 .012
hsa‐miR‐30dc GSTM4b .86 .024
hsa‐miR‐660 GSTA4 .86 .024
hsa‐miR‐320 UGT3A1b .86 .024
hsa‐miR‐616 SULT1A1 .86 .024
hsa‐miR‐200a GSTZ1 .86 .024
hsa‐miR‐200a GSTO1 .86 .024
hsa‐miR‐21 GSTA4 .86 .024
hsa‐miR‐886‐3p GSTM2P1 .82 .034
hsa‐miR‐92a TPMTb .82 .034
hsa‐miR‐320 SULT1A1 .82 .034
HSA‐MIR‐1180 NAT15 .82 .034
hsa‐miR‐361 NAT1 .79 .048
hsa‐miR‐92a GSTCD .79 .048
hsa‐miR‐30dc GSTM2 .79 .048
hsa‐miR‐660 GSTT1 .79 .048
hsa‐miR‐21 GSTT1 .79 .048
Negative correlation
hsa‐miR‐766 UGT1A3 −.96 .003
hsa‐miR‐148bc GSTO1 −.96 .003
hsa‐miR‐200bc SULT1A1 −.9 .006
hsa‐miR‐766 UGT2B4b −.93 .007
hsa‐miR‐18a UGT2B17 −.89 .012
hsa‐miR‐200bc NAT2 −.85 .016
hsa‐miR‐107 NAT1 −.86 .024
hsa‐miR‐660 SULT1A2 −.82 .034
hsa‐miR‐638 GSTA1 −.82 .034
hsa‐miR‐638 UGT2B15 −.82 .034
hsa‐miR‐25 GSTZ1 −.82 .034
hsa‐miR‐18a UGT2B15 −.82 .034
hsa‐miR‐23ac UGT2B10b −.82 .034
hsa‐miR‐744 UGT2A3 −.82 .034
hsa‐miR‐766 GSTA1 −.79 .048
hsa‐miR‐766 UGT2B15 −.79 .048
hsa‐miR‐218 GSTZ1 −.79 .048
hsa‐miR‐31 GSTO1 −.79 .048
hsa‐miR‐200bc SULT1A2 −.76 .049
a

Spearman correlation as assumption of normal distribution could not be made. Only significant correlations reported (< .05 by Spearman correlation). Only those genes and miRNAs significantly altered by rifampin treatment (up‐ or down‐regulated >1.25‐fold and < .05) were included in the correlation analyses.

b

Denotes genes predicted via TargetScan to be targets of the correlated miRNA.

c

Correspond to the nonpredominantly expressed miRNA sequence. TPMT, thiopurine S‐methyltransferase.