Skip to main content
. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11142–11147. doi: 10.1073/pnas.211424998

Table 3.

Relative intrinsic activities and relative potencies of various CRF-like antagonists

Antagonist Rel. intrinsic activity,* %
Rel. potency of antagonist, %
rCRFR1 mCRFR2β rCRFR1 mCRFR2β
Ast 9.8 (9.3–10.3) 1.1 (0.9–1.2) 86 (85–87) 99 (99–98)
[Glu11]Ast 8.4 (7.9–8.8) 0.84 (0.67–1.0) 86 (85–86) 98 (99–98)
[Glu11,16]Ast 9.1 (8.4–9.4) 1.0 (0.76–1.3) 83 (82–85) 97 (96–97)
aSvg-30 6.5 (6.1–6.8) 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 2.0 (0–6.9) 99 (98–99)
α-hel-CRF9–41 19 (18–20) 1.4 (1.2–1.5) 14 (13–15) 97 (96–97)
*

The intrinsic activity was determined by the stimulation of rCRFR1-HEK-293 cells and mCRFR2β-HEK-293 cells with 10 pM h/rCRF and Svg, respectively. Rel. intrinsic activity (%) = [cAMP (1 μM antagonist)/cAMP (10 nM agonist)] × 100. 

Rel. potency (%) = 100 − [cAMP (1 nM agonist + 1 μM antagonist)/cAMP (1 nM agonist)] × 100. Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.