Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 10;55(4):254–260. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104957

Table 3.

Clinical characteristics comparing AIP-positive and AIP-negative patients

Clinical characteristic AIP positive AIP negative P value
Familial, n (%) 89 (66.4) 518 (40.8) <0.001
Gender, n (% male) 83 (61.9) 597 (47.1) 0.001
Diagnosis, n (%) <0.001
 GH excess 119 (88.8) 648 (52)
 NFPA 4 (3) 181 (14.5)
 Prolactinoma 11 (8.2) 333 (26.7)
 Cushing’s disease 0 74 (5.9)
 Other diagnosis 0 11 (0.9)
Age of onset (years and percentages) <0.001
 0–18 79 (60.3) 259 (23.6)
 19–30 33 (25.2) 506 (46)
 >30 19 (14.5) 336 (30.5)
Age at diagnosis (years and percentages) <0.001
 0–18 53 (40.5) 163 (14.1)
 19–30 44 (33.6) 497 (43)
 >30 34 (26) 495 (42.9)
Maximum diameter (mm)* 16 (10.7–25) 20 (11–30) 0.518
Macroadenoma, n (%) 112 (93.3) 865 (80.2) <0.001
Extrasellar extension, n (%) 52 (81.3) 394 (58.1) <0.001
Pituitary apoplexy, n (%) 12 (9.5) 36 (3.3) 0.001
Number of treatments* 2 (1–3) 1(1–2) 0.055

*Median and IQR.

NFPA, non-functioning pituitary adenoma.