Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 26;56(4):e01730-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01730-17

TABLE 1.

Four different methods of serogrouping D. nodosus compared at the flock levela

Flock No. of sheep examined No. of sheep sampled No. of feet sampled Culture based serogrouping (pure cultures)
Culture independent serogrouping (lesion swabs)
Slide agglutination
fimA PCR
fimA PCR on mSTM swabs
fimA PCR on LB swabs
No. of isolates tested Serogroup(s) detected No. of isolates tested Serogroup(s) detected No. of swabs tested Serogroup(s) detected No. of swabs tested Serogroup(s) detected
1 51 24 24 25 A, (D), (G) 25 A 24 A 24 A
2 52 42 50 46 A, B, H, I, (D), (F), (G) 36 A, B, H, I 50 A, B, G, H, I 50 A, B, G, H, I
3 42 20 20 36 C, D, E, G, I, (H), (M) 34 C, D, E, G, H, I 20 D, G, H 20 D, E, G, H
4 33 20 20 36 A, B, E, H, I, (C), (D) 36 A, B, E, H, I 20 A, B, E, G, H 20 A, B, E, G, H, I
5 34 20 20 33 A, B, D, G, H, (C), (M) 33 A, E, D, G, H, I 20 A, B, E, G, H 20 A, B, D, E, G, H
6 28 20 20 19 A, B, (D), (E), (H), (I) 19 B 20 A, B 20 A, B
7 13 13 13 13 A, B 13 B 13 A, B 13 A, B
8 27 20 20 20 E, G, H, (B) 20 E, G, H 20 G, H 20 E, G, H
9 20 20 20 14 A, B, E, G, H 14 A, B, E, H 20 A, B, E 20 A, B, E, G
10 12 12 12 11 G 10 G 0 Not tested 12 E, F, G, H
11 26 25 25 22 C, H, (B), (D), (E), (F) 21 H 0 Not tested 25 A, C, D, E, G, H
12 26 25 25 15 E, (C), (G) 14 E 0 Not tested 25 E
Total 364 261 269 290 275 207 269
a

Ambiguous slide agglutination test results are shown in parentheses. mSTM, modified Stuart's transport medium; LB, lysis buffer.