Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 25;223(3):1565–1587. doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1568-y

Table 1.

Clustered distribution of GABAB1, GIRK2 and CaV2.1 in active zones and dendritic shafts and spines

Molecule Compartment Real NND Simulated NND p value Association (%) N
GABAB1 Active zone 22.5 ± 5.6 35.8 ± 13.2 2.3E−04 78.9 19
Dendrite 38.9 ± 17.4 83.2 ± 28.6 2.8E−10 96.0 25
Spine 27.1 ± 16.5 44.9 ± 26.2 5.3E−19 89.0 91
GIRK2 Active zone 19.8 ± 5.2 48.7 ± 23.3 8.7E−05 89.5 19
Dendrite 43.2 ± 29.2 204.8 ± 123.9 5.3E−06 100.0 24
Spine 30.6 ± 22.2 80.6 ± 37.7 1.2E−24 83.0 88
CaV2.1 Active zone 20.0 ± 5.8 37.3 ± 24.4 3.9E−04 97.1 35
Dendrite 36.9 ± 16.9 141.8 ± 102.6 2.4E−04 100.0 26
Spine 27.6 ± 17.5 66.0 ± 33.5 1.5E−04 84.2 19

NNDs are reported as mean ± standard deviation of image means, in case of simulations, image means are the means over all 500 simulations of that image. p values were obtained by two-sided paired t test followed by Holm–Bonferroni correction. “Association” shows the percentage of image means within the lowest 2.5% of simulation means. In none of the images did we detect a significant dissociation, i.e. a mean NND within the highest 2.5% of simulated mean NNDs. N indicates the number of images used for analysis