(A) EGFR mutant NSCLC cells were stimulated with NE (10 μM) for 24 hours and then treated with erlotinib. Cell viability was determined by MTS assay. *p<0.0001; by two-tailed Student’s t-test. Bars are means ± s.d. (B) HCC827 cells were treated with propranolol (PPL; *p≤0.03) or (C) IL-6 neutralizing antibodies (*p<0.001) before NE stimulation. After 24 hours, cells were treated with erlotinib for 5 days. Cell viability was evaluated by MTS assay. (D) Ten mice per cell line were injected subcutaneously (control n=5; stress n=5). Chronic stress was induced via restraint. For HCC4006, all mice developed tumors. For HCC827, 4 and 2 mice developed tumors in the stress and control groups, respectively. Data are graphed as means ± s.e.m. *p<0.04; two-tailed Student’s t-test. (E) HCC827 tumor-bearing mice were treated with isoproterenol (β-AR agonist) for three days. Tumors were collected, and IL-6 mRNA was measured by quantitative PCR (control group n=13; ISO group n=7, run as technical duplicates). *p=0.02 two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are graphed as means ± s.e.m. (F) Erlotinib induced tumor regression in HCC827 xenografts. (G) After prolonged erlotinib treatment, resistant disease emerged in mice treated with erlotinib plus isoproterenol compared to mice receiving erlotinib alone (p=0.018). PPL (p=0.035) or IL-6 antibody, siltuximab (Silt, p=0.009), blocked the effect. *p=0.018; means ± s.e.m.