Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 27;37:69. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0740-4

Table 1.

The relationship between expression of YAP and clinical pathological features in pancreatic cancer

Samples (n) YAP expression n (%)
None Weak Moderate Strong P value
Sex 0.755
 Male 45 8(17.8) 19(42.2) 9(20.0) 9(20.0)
 Female 27 6(22.2) 8(29.6) 6(22.2) 7(26.0)
Age 0.306
 ≤55a 37 9(24.3) 16(43.2) 6(16.2) 6(16.2)
 >55 35 5(14.3) 11(31.4) 9(25.7) 10(28.6)
Histological grade 0.780
 Well 11 2(18.2) 6(54.5) 1(9.1) 2(18.2)
 Moderate 49 11(22.4) 16(32.7) 11(22.4) 11(22.4)
 Poor 12 1(8.3) 5(41.7) 3(25.0) 3(25.0)
TNM stage (AJCC) 0.012*
 I 2 1(50.0) 1(50.0) 0(0) 0(0)
 II 59 12(20.3) 26(44.1) 9(15.3) 12(20.3)
 III 6 1(16.7) 0(0) 4(66.7) 1(16.7)
 IV 5 0(0) 0(0) 2(40.0) 3(60.0)
pT status 0.135
 T1 0 0(0) 0(0) 0(0) 0(0)
 T2 8 1(12.5) 3(37.5) 2(25) 2(25)
 T3 58 12(20.7) 24(41.4) 9(15.5) 13(22.4)
 T4 6 1(16.7) 0(0) 4(66.7) 1(16.7)
pN status 0.755
 N0 55 11(20.0) 22(40.0) 10(18.2) 12(21.8)
 N1 17 3(17.7) 5(29.4) 5(29.4) 4(23.5)
pM status 0.028*
 M0 67 14(20.9) 27(40.3) 13(19.4) 13(19.4)
 M1 5 0(0) 0(0) 2(40.0) 3(60.0)

χ2 test; *Significant different, P< 0.05

aMedian age