Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 5;33(19):3080–3087. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx360

Table 1.

The TPR, TNR and TDR of different methods

Scenario JDINACa
DiffCorrb
DEDN
cPLR
TDR TPR TNR TDR TPR TNR TDR TPR TNR TDR TPR TNR
1 93.7 81.6 99.9 81.3 100 99.8 33.5 96.7 99 19.8 64.9 97.3
2 95.6 74.5 99.9 85 100 99.7 16.5 89.1 94.3 25.6 49.8 97.1
3 88.3 69.5 99.3 7.5 0.2 99.8 2.1 10.1 81.6 53.6 23.6 98.1
4 99.9 99.8 100 3.8 0.4 99.9 5.0 0.2 100 0.7 0.3 99.8

Average of 100 replications, %, the best performance is highlighted in bold.

a

Pair (Gi,Gj) was taken as differential edge in the network for JDINAC, when the differential dependency weight wij4.

b

Set to control the FDR = 0.1.