Table 1.
Scenario | JDINACa |
DiffCorrb |
DEDN |
cPLR |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDR | TPR | TNR | TDR | TPR | TNR | TDR | TPR | TNR | TDR | TPR | TNR | |
1 | 93.7 | 81.6 | 99.9 | 81.3 | 100 | 99.8 | 33.5 | 96.7 | 99 | 19.8 | 64.9 | 97.3 |
2 | 95.6 | 74.5 | 99.9 | 85 | 100 | 99.7 | 16.5 | 89.1 | 94.3 | 25.6 | 49.8 | 97.1 |
3 | 88.3 | 69.5 | 99.3 | 7.5 | 0.2 | 99.8 | 2.1 | 10.1 | 81.6 | 53.6 | 23.6 | 98.1 |
4 | 99.9 | 99.8 | 100 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 99.9 | 5.0 | 0.2 | 100 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 99.8 |
Average of 100 replications, %, the best performance is highlighted in bold.
Pair was taken as differential edge in the network for JDINAC, when the differential dependency weight .
Set to control the FDR = 0.1.