Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jul 18;23(11):1861–1869. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.07.006

Table 4.

Univariate Cox model for PFS/OS for (A) entire cohort and (B) subset of PET- negative CR1 patients (B), where maintenance rituximab was modeled as a time-dependent covariate and all other variables time-independent covariates.

A. Entire Cohort PFS OS
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value

Gender: Female vs. Male (Ref) 0.46(0.27,0.78) 0.004 0.44(0.23,0.84) 0.013
Age (year) 1.02(1.00,1.05) 0.074 1.03(1.00,1.06) 0.054
Diagnosis Year: 2006 and later vs. before 2006 (Ref) 0.46(0.3,0.71) <0.001 0.34(0.19,0.59) <0.001
B Symptoms: No vs. Yes (Ref) 0.83(0.50,1.36) 0.45 0.84(0.48,1.49) 0.56
Bone marrow involvement: No vs. Yes (Ref) 1.07(0.66,1.73) 0.79 0.94(0.53,1.69) 0.84
Extranodal involvement: No vs. Yes (Ref) 1.26(0.82,1.94) 0.28 1.43(0.85,2.42) 0.18
Blastoid variant: No vs. Yes (Ref) 0.58(0.29,1.15) 0.12 0.43(0.21,0.91) 0.027
MIPI
  Intermediate/high vs. low risk (Ref) 1.62(0.98,2.70) 0.061 1.49(0.84,2.62) 0.17
  Unknown vs. low risk (Ref) 1.47(0.87,2.47) 0.15 1.02(0.56,1.88) 0.94
High-dose cytarabine pre-ASCT: No vs. Yes (Ref) 1.56(1.05,2.32) 0.027 1.59(1.00,2.54) 0.052
Rituximab pre-ASCT: No vs. Yes (Ref) 2.16(1.22,3.82) 0.008 1.69(0.87,3.27) 0.12
Regimens pre-ASCT: 2–3 vs. 1 (Ref) 2.11(1.42,3.15) <0.001 2.6(1.63,4.13) <0.001
Time from diagnosis to ASCT (month) 1.01(1.00,1.02) 0.069 1.01(1.00,1.02) 0.17
ASCT year: 2007 and later vs. before 2007 (Ref) 0.41(0.27,0.63) <0.001 0.29(0.17,0.52) <0.001
Disease status : PR1/CR2/PR2/PR3 vs. CR1 (Ref) 2.74(1.82,4.14) <0.001 3.15(1.97,5.02) <0.001
ASCT Conditioning: Radiation-based vs. Chemotherapy-only (Ref) 0.96(0.64,1.44) 0.85 0.74(0.46,1.19) 0.21
Maintenance rituximab: Yes vs. No (Ref) 0.22 (0.13,0.37) <0.001 0.14 (0.07, 0.31) <0.001
B. PET negative CR1a PFS OS
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value

Gender: Female vs. Male (Ref) 0.47(0.21,1.04) 0.062 0.19(0.04,0.82) 0.026
Age (year) 1.06(1.01,1.11) 0.010 1.11(1.04,1.19) 0.002
Diagnosis Year: 2006 and later vs. before 2006 (Ref) 0.70(0.35,1.40) 0.31 0.44(0.18,1.09) 0.076
B Symptoms: No vs. Yes (Ref) 0.45(0.20,1.00) 0.049 0.58(0.19,1.75) 0.33
Bone marrow involvement: No vs. Yes (Ref) 0.78(0.32,1.87) 0.57 0.24(0.03,1.77) 0.16
Extranodal involvement: No vs. Yes (Ref) 1.35(0.67,2.73) 0.41 2.93(0.86,10.02) 0.087
Blastoid variant: No vs. Yes (Ref) 0.41(0.14,1.16) 0.093 0.28(0.08,0.98) 0.046
MIPI
  Intermediate/high vs. low risk (Ref) 2.38(1.03,5.51) 0.042 2.25(0.80,6.34) 0.12
  Unknown vs. low risk (Ref) 2.19(0.96,5.02) 0.063 0.81(0.25,2.68) 0.73
High-dose cytarabine Pre-ASCT: No vs. Yes (Ref) 2.38(1.25,4.54) 0.009 2.68(1.07, 6.73) 0.036
Regimens pre-ASCT: 2–3 vs. 1 (Ref) 1.44(0.66,3.14) 0.36 2.19(0.79,6.07) 0.13
Time from diagnosis to ASCT (month) 1.00(0.97,1.03) 0.91 1.00(0.96,1.04) 0.92
ASCT year: 2007 and later vs. before 2007 (Ref) 0.71(0.35,1.43) 0.34 0.45(0.18,1.12) 0.088
ASCT Conditioning: Radiation-based vs. Chemotherapy-only (Ref) 0.76 (0.39,1.47) 0.41 0.35 (0.13,0.94) 0.037
Maintenance rituximab: Yes vs. No (Ref) 0.22 (0.11,0.46) <0.001 0.11 (0.03,0.38) <0.001

Abbreviations: CR, complete remission; ASCT, high-dose therapy; MIPI, mantle cell lymphoma International prognostic index; PR, partial remission.

a

Variables excluded: disease status due to all patients being CR1; pre-HCT Rituxan due to only 1 patient being “No”.