Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 11;33(14):2123–2130. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx119

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The comparison of GWAS enrichment for eQTLs identified by different approaches with FDR ranging from 0.05 to 105. (a) The relative risk (RR) of GWAS enrichment for CLS, QRank and QRank-LR identified eQTLs in comparison with LR identified eQTLs. (b) The RR of GWAS enrichment for LR and QRank-LR identified tissue-specific eQTLs in comparison with LR identified eQTLs (tissue-specific and non-tissue-specific)