Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 23;33(5):631–639. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw600

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

RFS criterion scores on biological data of supertree methods; lower is better. MulRF and PluMiST could not be run on the CPL dataset due to its large size; hence no values are shown for those methods on that dataset. Overall, FastRFS-enhanced produces the best RFS criterion scores on these datasets