Table 1.
N | Nigella Sativa treated Group | Control group | P† |
---|---|---|---|
N = 20 | N = 20 | ||
Age (years) | 35.70 ± 8.18 | 33.95 ± 8.72 | 0.52 |
Female [n(%)] | 17 (85) | 17 (85) | 0.89 |
Weight (kg) | |||
Before | 70.52 ± 12.27 | 69.63 ± 11.75 | 0.81 |
After | 69.39 11.84 | 69.62 11.80 | 0.95 |
P‡ | 0.004 | 0.91 | |
BMI (kg/m2) | |||
Before | 27.10 ± 4.63 | 25.93 ± 4.07 | 0.40 |
After | 26.63 ± 4.42 | 25.95 ± 4.11 | 0.61 |
P‡ | 0.002 | 0.65 | |
WHR | |||
Before | 0.86 ± 0.052 | 0.87 ± 0.053 | 0.53 |
After | 0.86 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 4.11 | 0.61 |
P ‡ | 0.38 | 0.53 | |
Physical activity (Met-min/day) | |||
Before | 5.25 ± 0.40 | 5.29 ± 0.56 | 0.81 |
After | 5.26 ± 0.43 | 5.55 ± 0.89 | 0.20 |
P ‡ | 0.89 | 0.22 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or number (percent). BMI body mass index, WC waist circumference, HC hip circumference, WHR waist to hip ratio; †P values for ANCOVA after adjustment for age, duration of the disease and variable’s baseline value; ‡ P values for paired t-test
The bold data present statistically significant values