Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2015 Mar 16;28(4):797–809. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00017

Table 2.

Reactivity Scores Correlated More Closely with Trapping Agent Depletion than QSAR Modelsa

peptide QSAR reactivity model MRS
GSH 0.30 (p-value = 0.0709) 0.43 (p-value = 0.0064)
cysteine 0.38 (p-value = 0.0210) 0.56 (p-value = 0.0003)
lysine 0.26 (p-value = 0.1310) 0.41 (p-value = 0.0126)
histidine 0.14 (p-value = 0.4295) 0.24 (p-value = 0.1504)
a

The correlations between peptide reactivity and QSAR predictions (eq 2) are molecule reactivity scores (MRS) were calculated for 38 structurally diverse contact allergens.23 Reactivity was measured by peptide depletion assays, with incubation times of 15 min for GSH or 24 h for peptides containing cysteine, lysine, or histidine. Across the results of all four assays, reactivity was more significantly correlated with MRS than by the QSAR model. Statistically significant correlations are in bold.