Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Feb 6;65:140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.01.020

Figure 2. Evaluation of M20 and nTg control mice in inverted wire, pole descending and grip tests.

Figure 2

(A) The M20 mice (n = 10) showed shorter times of grip to inverted wire grid as compared to their nTg littermates (n = 12) (p < 0.05). (B and C) Pole descending test; after being placed at the top of 50-cm vertical pole, the M20 mice showed shorter latencies of head-down turns than nTg control (B, p < 0.05). Also, their descent time was shorter than the descent of the control mice (C, p < 0.01). (D) The grip strength of the forelimbs of both M20 and nTg mice was comparable. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.