Table 1.

Systematic reviews on the effectiveness of atraumatic restorative treatment on primary teeth.

Authors, Year [Reference]	No. of Studies Included	Main Findings	Quality Assessment *
Van’t Hof et al. 2006 [17]	28	The 3-year survival rate for single-surface ART restorations was 86% Higher annual failure rate (17%) of multi-surface ART restorations, compared to that (5%) of single-surface restorations	Critically low
Mickenautsch et al. 2010 [19]	7	No difference in the 2-year retention rates of ART and amalgam for single-surface restorations	Moderate
de Amorim et al. 2012 [18]	29	The respective 2-year survival rates of single- and multi-surface ART restorations were 93% and 62%	Low
Duangthip et al. 2016 [21]	9	The use of less-invasive approach with ART is beneficial in managing ECC in young children	Moderate
Tedesco et al. 2017 [27]	4	No difference in survival rate between ART and conventional Class II restorations	Moderate

* The quality assessment was based on the “Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews” (AMSTAR) tool [26].