Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 27;18:221. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3049-2

Table 3.

Betweeness centrality for each participant. The cells in bold show two bridger participants

Paritcipant ID. Betweenness centrality Paritcipant ID. Betweenness centrality Paritcipant ID. Betweenness centrality Paritcipant ID. Betweenness centrality
2001 0.0 2017 11.4 2033 25.1 2049 78.9
2002 150.9 2018 0 2034 6.7 2050 36.8
2003 0.0 2019 0.6 2035 0.7 2051 195.5
2004 44.0 2020 5.3 2036 16.1 2052 128.6
2005 0.0 2021 63.3 2037 35.4 2053 104.0
2006 28.9 2022 13.3 2038 32.4 2054 0
2007 0.0 2023 23.1 2039 123.5 2055 2.7
2008 1291.0 2024 167.7 2040 0 2056 0
2009 164.0 2025 13.1 2041 5.6 2057 163.3
2010 113.9 2026 1.2 2042 1.2 2058 1.2
2011 54.3 2027 88.4 2043 0.2 2059 1.2
2012 1099.0 2028 66.5 2044 57.6 2060 11.5
2013 0.0 2029 72.7 2045 0.2 2061 151.7
2014 186.9 2030 20.0 2046 12.7 2062 18.9
2015 0.0 2031 17.8 2047 224.2 2063 10.5
2016 174.8 2032 218.0 2048 1.3 2064 93.1
2065 13.7

Betweeness centrality = the degree of shortest path of consultation seeking between all staff passing through the informant