Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;2018:3106918. doi: 10.1155/2018/3106918

Table 2.

Summary of the Stroop task response times (expressed as mean ± SD and tested using paired-sample t-test).

Area Protocol Target Before After Difference p value
rIFG cTBS CON 410.6 ± 80.6 406.1 ± 71.1 −4.6 ± 21.3 0.351
INCON 415.2 ± 75.4 414.0 ± 71.2 −1.2 ± 16.9 0.750
p value 0.345 0.014 0.422

rIFG iTBS CON 426.3 ± 103.5 426.3 ± 109.6 0.0 ± 32.2 0.999
INCON 429.7 ± 110.7 420.4 ± 112.2 −9.3 ± 32.5 0.218
p value 0.326 0.123 0.057

lSPL cTBS CON 418.6 ± 90.2 406.6 ± 79.8 −12.0 ± 30.7 0.096
INCON 423.0 ± 92.2 412.4 ± 78.2 −10.6 ± 27.2 0.098
p value 0.200 0.138 0.775

lSPL iTBS CON 412.0 ± 81.7 397.8 ± 64.7 −14.1 ± 31.7 0.060
INCON 418.8 ± 83.8 404.3 ± 68.1 −14.6 ± 32.0 0.056
p value 0.030 0.039 0.888

Note: rIFG = right inferior frontal gyrus; lSPL = left superior parietal lobule; cTBS = continuous theta burst stimulation; iTBS = intermittent theta burst stimulation; CON = congruent stimuli; INCON = incongruent stimuli. Trends towards enhanced cognitive speed enhanced by the stimulation (although nonsignificant) are depicted in bold.