Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2018 Mar 8;10(3):325. doi: 10.3390/nu10030325

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2018 by the authors.

Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

PMC Copyright notice

nFAG dietary supplementation does not affect MOG-induced upregulation of markers of macrophage infiltration including cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68; A,B) and endothelial growth factor-like module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1 (F4/80; C,D), as well as the expression and the content of oncomodulin (OCM; E,F). Levels were evaluated in control and MOG-treated mice, without or with nFAG dietary supplementation. Transcripts (A,C,E) were evaluated by relative quantification with qPCR. Data were analyzed by the formula 2^−ΔΔCT using Rpl13a as the internal standard. Proteins (B,D,F) were evaluated by ELISA (LifeSpan Biosciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). Data are shown as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 9 for each experimental group). * p < 0.001 versus control (one-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison post-hoc test). White bars, control mice; dashed bars, control mice with nFAG dietary supplementation; black bars, MOG-treated mice; grey bars, MOG-treated mice with nFAG dietary supplementation.

nFAG dietary supplementation does not affect MOG-induced upregulation of markers of macrophage infiltration including cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68; A,B) and endothelial growth factor-like module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1 (F4/80; C,D), as well as the expression and the content of oncomodulin (OCM; E,F). Levels were evaluated in control and MOG-treated mice, without or with nFAG dietary supplementation. Transcripts (A,C,E) were evaluated by relative quantification with qPCR. Data were analyzed by the formula 2^−ΔΔCT using Rpl13a as the internal standard. Proteins (B,D,F) were evaluated by ELISA (LifeSpan Biosciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). Data are shown as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 9 for each experimental group). * p < 0.001 versus control (one-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison post-hoc test). White bars, control mice; dashed bars, control mice with nFAG dietary supplementation; black bars, MOG-treated mice; grey bars, MOG-treated mice with nFAG dietary supplementation.