Table 3.
+/+ clones induced in backgrounds heterozygous for Minute and deficiencies and ovoD1+ clone marker
| Heterozygous background | Age of clone induction, h ± ln AEL | n experiment replicas | n females examined | n females with clone | Mitotic recombination frequency | n females dissected | n clones in one ovary (frequency) | n clones in both ovaries (frequency)† | Average no. ovarioles with clone, 〈x〉 ± σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +/Df(3L)emcE12 | 2 | 3 | 1890 | 44 | 0.02 | 25 | 7 (0.28) | 18 (0.72) | 13.50 ± 3.69 |
| 48 | 1 | 660 | 85 | 0.13 | 84 | 59 (0.70) | 25 (0.30) | 8.50 ± 3.18 | |
| +/Df(3L)CH39 | 2 | 1 | 563 | 4* | 0.01 | 4 | 3 (0.75) | 1 (0.25)‡ | 13.60 ± 3.83 |
| 48 | 1 | 694 | 28 | 0.04 | 28 | 18 (0.64) | 10 (0.36) | 9.24 ± 4.04 | |
| +/Df(3L)Aprt-1 | 2 | 1 | 201 | 10 | 0.05 | 10 | 1 (0.10) | 9 (0.90) | 13.68 ± 3.52 |
| 48 | 1 | 133 | 23 | 0.17 | 23 | 2 (0.09) | 21 (0.91) | 11.54 ± 4.56 | |
| +/Df(3L)M21 | 2 | 2 | 649 | 9 | 0.01 | 9 | 4 (0.44) | 5 (0.56)‡ | 13.86 ± 3.61 |
| 48 | 2 | 501 | 22 | 0.04 | 22 | 10 (0.45) | 12 (0.54) | 11.71 ± 4.46 |
*
The recombinant chromosome was lost before more data could be gathered.
†
All frequencies of clones in both ovaries were only slightly higher than those predicted by the Poisson distribution, except for ‡, which were substantially higher (>10 times greater).