Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Behav Med. 2017 Feb 11;40(4):602–611. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9829-z

Table 2.

Medication regimen complexity predicting medication adherence

b (SE b) t β
Block 1
Age .24 (.16) 1.49 .09
Race −7.5 (3.46)* −2.17* −.13*
Education −.59 (.99) −.59 −.04
NYHA class −3.79 (2.01)± −1.89± −.04±
MSPSS .32 (.10)** 3.26** .19**
Charlson −.49 (.83) −.58 −.03
3MS .21 (.24) .88 .06
R2 .097
F 4.38***
Block 2
MRCI −.11 (.12) −.88 −.05
ΔR2 .002
ΔF .77
Block 3
PHQ-9 −.62 (.36)± −1.74± −.1±
ΔR2 .01±
ΔF 3.01±
Block 4
Interaction −.06 (.03)* −2.17* −.33*
ΔR2 .015*
ΔF 4.70*

NYHA New York Heart Association, MSPSS Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, 3MS Modified Mini-Mental Status Examination, PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9, MRCI Medication Regimen Complexity Index total score; Interaction = cross product of PHQ-9 and MRCI

±

p = .08;

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < .001