Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 4;13(4):232–238. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12218

Table 2.

Standard multiple regression of portion size variables on child BMI percentile

Variables Mean (SD) B β 95% CI sr 2 (unique) Model fit
Model 1
Child IP (kcal) 470 (167) 0.005 0.03 (−.016, .027) 0.001 R 2 = .24
Parent IP (kcal) 495 (137) −0.023 −0.12 (−.049, .002) 0.013 Adjusted R 2 = .22
Parent IP est. (kcal) 395 (124) 0.074 *** 0.33 (.046, .103) 0.1 R = .49 ***
Parent BMI 27.9 (6.2) 1.170 *** 0.26 (.594, 1.745) 0.064 Intercept =14.962
Liking 55.0 (17.9) 0.076 0.05 (−.118, .271) 0.002
Model 2
Child MP (kcal) 615 (196) −0.009 −0.07 (−.028, .009) 0.003 R 2 = .19
Parent MP est. (kcal) 508 (140) 0.054 *** 0.27 (.028, .080) 0.07 Adjusted R 2 = .17
Parent BMI 27.9 (6.2) 1.304 *** 0.29 (.725, 1.884) 0.08 R = .43 ***
Liking 55.0 (17.9) 0.096 0.06 (−.103, .295) 0.004 Intercept = 8.56

Notes. IP, ideal portion size; MP, maximum portion size; parent IP est., parent estimates of their child's ideal portion size; parent MP est., parent estimates of their child's maximum portion size.

***

p < .001.