Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 15;24(2):104–107. doi: 10.5152/dir.2018.17336

Table 2.

ASPECTS agreement between different raters

Cohen κ (95% CI)
Agreement between consensus of 2 neuroradiologists and a neuroimaging fellow for total ASPECTS assessed with Cohen’s κ Total ASPECTS Setting 1 0.486 (0.235–0.736)
Setting 2 0.583 (0.353–0.814)
Setting 3 0.678 (0.458–0.898)

Agreement between consensus of 2 neuroradiologists and a senior radiology resident for total ASPECTS assessed with Cohen’s κ Total ASPECTS Setting 1 0.198 (−0.111–0.507)
Setting 2 0.491 (0.246–0.737)
Setting 3 0.443 (0.201–0.684)

Correlation among the three ratings (consensus, neuroradiology fellow and senior radiology resident) for total ASPECTS assessed with ICC Total ASPECTS ICC (95% CI) Interpretation
Setting 1 0.741 (0.571–0.851) Good
Setting 2 0.936 (0.893–0.963) Very good
Setting 3 0.780 (0.785–0.925) Good

Setting 1, 80 HU window width and 20 HU center level; Setting 2, 8 HU window width and 32 HU center level;

Setting 3, 20 HU window width with 35 HU center level.

ASPECTS, Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.