. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11388–11393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.201140198

Table 2.

Mixed general linear models of the fitness of Cam^R, Kan^R, and Tet^R mutants relative to the progenitor

Fixed factors source	ndf	Cam^R		Kan^R		Tet^R
Fixed factors source	ndf	ddf	Type III F	ddf	Type III F	ddf	Type III F
Temperature	1	98.0	6.60^**	21.1	0.04^ns	129.0	0.15^ns
Resource	1	6.1	0.51^ns	9.1	1.91^ns	8.6	25.31^***
Temperature × resource	1	98.0	0.22^ns	21.1	0.36^ns	129.0	0.52^ns

Random factors source	df	Test full model	LR Test Statistic
Random factors source	df	Test full model	Cam^R	Kan^R	Tet^R
Block	1	a	0.75^ns	2.15⁺	1.75⁺
Mutation	1	b	973.64^***	60.22^***	19.95^***
Mutation × temperature	2	c	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns
Mutation × resource	2	c	138.38^***	236.52^***	79.62^***
Mutation × resource variance effect	1	c	23.29^***	37.30^***	19.91^***
Mutation × temperature × resource	4	a	0.00^ns	1.88^ns	0.00^ns

See Table 1 for details of test construction and significance categories.

, 0.01 < P < 0.05.