Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0194985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194985

Table 1. Comparisons among ToPs/R, existing clinical risk scores, regression methods, and machine learning benchmarks for post-transplantation survival prediction using C-index and AUC (at horizons of 3-months, 1-year, 3-years, and 10-years).

Methods AUC (Mean ± Std) C-index (Mean ± Std)
3-month 1-year 3-year 10-year
ToPs/R .660 ± .003 .641 ± .005 .623 ± .005 .631 ± .003 .577 ± .003
DRI .540 ± .007 .547 ± .004 .547 ± .003 .556 ± .005 .529 ± .002
IMPACT .561 ± .005 .556 ± .006 .549 ± .007 .558 ± .005 .527 ± .003
RSS .587 ± .006 .582 ± .006 .570 ± .004 .547 ± .003 .544 ± .003
Cox .572 ± .006 .579 ± .005 .553 ± .005 .577 ± .004 .519 ± .003
Linear P .632 ± .007 .617 ± .003 .596 ± .003 .612 ± .005 .554 ± .003
Logit R .629 ± .007 .613 ± .007 .599 ± .006 .611 ± .007 .554 ± .004
AdaBoost .605 ± .006 .605 ± .006 .588 ± .004 .596 ± .004 .551 ± .003
DeepBoost .594 ± .009 .608 ± .004 .591 ± .006 .594 ± .004 .548 ± .003
LogitBoost .621 ± .005 .614 ± .004 .596 ± .004 .611 ± .003 .554 ± .003
XGBoost .565 ± .007 .553 ± .005 .548 ± .003 .584 ± .005 .530 ± .003
DT .592 ± .007 .595 ± .004 .575 ± .004 .595 ± .003 .543 ± .003
RF .625 ± .004 .610 ± .004 .597 ± .003 .607 ± .004 .555 ± .003
NN .600 ± .003 .608 ± .007 .587 ± .004 .598 ± .003 .550 ± .003

Linear P: Linear Perceptron, Logit R: Logistic Regression, DT: Decision Tree, RF: Random Forest, NN: Neural Nets