Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0194985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194985

Table 4. Comparisons among ToPs/R, existing clinical risk scores, regression methods, and machine learning benchmarks for post-transplantation survival prediction using C-index and AUC (at horizons of 3-months, 1-year, and 3-years).

Train on 2005-2009; predict on 2010-2015.

Methods AUC (Mean ± Std) C-index (Mean ± Std)
3-month 1-year 3-year
ToPs/R .688 ± .001 .651 ± .001 .639 ± .009 .625 ± .007
DRI .551 ± .014 .559 ± .016 .546 ± .014 .542 ± .013
IMPACT .598 ± .013 .593 ± .001 .585 ± .011 .574 ± .009
RSS .593 ± .017 .599 ± .020 .584 ± .013 .580 ± .012
Cox .588 ± .012 .581 ± .009 .560 ± .010 .565 ± .007
Linear P .666 ± .018 .632 ± .009 .600 ± .008 .608 ± .008
Logit R .662 ± .009 .633 ± .007 .604 ± .008 .609 ± .006
AdaBoost .643 ± .009 .630 ± .009 .606 ± .013 .607 ± .009
DeepBoost .643 ± .009 .630 ± .010 .608 ± .006 .606 ± .008
LogitBoost .655± .009 .632 ± .007 .602 ± .013 .607 ± .008
XGBoost .574 ± .010 .567 ± .011 .554 ± .010 .555 ± .008
DT .603 ± .009 .619 ± .008 .575 ± .009 .585 ± .007
RF .641 ± .009 .628 ± .006 .613 ± .008 .606 ± .006
NN .648 ± .014 .628 ± .009 .600 ± .011 .604 ± .007