Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 8;17(5):509–522. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6287

Table 3.

Comparison between RadShield approach and geometry‐based approach for three sources with three degrees of freedom.

RadShield Approach Geometry‐based Approach Comparison
X Location (m) Y Location (m) Air‐Kerma Rate (mGy wk1) X Location (m) Y Location (m) Air‐Kerma Rate (mGy wk1) Location Error (m) Air‐Kerma Rate % Error
2.64E+00
2.66E+00
9.77E01
2.65E+00
2.65E+00
9.77E01
1.41E02
6.27E04
2.80E+00
2.82E+00
9.33E01
2.81E+00
2.81E+00
9.33E01
1.42E02
5.78E04
2.32E+00
2.32E+00
1.08E+00
2.31E+00
2.31E+00
1.08E+00
1.23E02
3.12E04
2.16E+00
2.80E+00
1.07E+00
2.16E+00
2.81E+00
1.07E+00
7.16E03
1.82E04
3.56E+00
5.08E+00
7.62E01
3.56E+00
5.08E+00
7.62E01
3.26E03
2.54E05
3.58E+00
5.16E+00
7.49E01
3.57E+00
5.17E+00
7.49E01
1.08E02
2.64E04
2.40E01
2.40E01
8.93E01
2.33E01
2.33E01
8.93E01
1.02E02
6.73E04
3.30E+00
5.12E+00
8.62E01
3.30E+00
5.13E+00
8.62E01
8.16E03
2.85E04
4.10E+00
9.82E+00
5.82E01
4.11E+00
9.82E+00
5.82E01
5.95E03
2.80E04
4.10E+00
9.84E+00
5.80E01
4.11E+00
9.83E+00
5.80E01
1.29E02
1.24E03
6.00E02
6.00E02
7.86E01
5.69E02
6.43E02
7.86E01
5.30E03
2.47E04
4.12E+00
9.74E+00
6.43E01
4.12E+00
9.74E+00
6.43E01
4.04E03
1.11E04
5.80E+00
2.76E+00
7.75E01
5.80E+00
2.76E+00
7.75E01
4.60E03
8.57E05
5.84E+00
2.82E
7.63E01
5.85E+00
2.82E+00
7.63E01
8.88E03
4.65E04
2.60E01
1.40E01
8.72E01
2.54E01
1.30E01
8.72E01
1.17E02
9.95E04
5.80E+00
4.96E+00
8.30E01
5.80E+00
4.95E+00
8.30E01
6.75E03
1.41E04