Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 14;3(4):308–316. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0125

Table 2. Hazard Ratios for the Combined Outcome and All-Cause Mortality.

Outcome All Patients Biventricular Circulation Fontan Circulation
No (%), ACR ≥30 vs <30 mg/g HR (95% CI) P Value No (%), ACR ≥30 vs <30 mg/g HR (95% CI) P Value No (%), ACR ≥30 vs <30 mg/g HR (95% CI) P Value
Combined outcomea
ACR ≥30 mg/g, univariate 30/106 (28.3)
vs 38/506 (7.5)
3.0
(1.9-4.9)
<.001 25/82 (30.5)
vs 21/444 (4.7)
4.5
(2.5-8.0)
<.001 5/24 (20.8)
vs 17/62 (27.4)
1.0
(0.4-2.8)
.95
ACR ≥30 mg/g, adjusted model 1b NA 2.4
(1.4-4.1)
.002 NA 2.6
(1.3-5.4)
.01 NA 0.9
(0.3-2.9)
.89
ACR ≥30 mg/g, adjusted model 2c NA 2.2
(1.3-4.0)
.01 NA 2.6
(1.2-5.6)
.01 NA 0.9
(0.3-3.0)
.85
Mortalityd
ACR ≥30 mg/g 11/106 (10.4)
vs 6/506 (1.2)
6.4
(2.4-17.3)
<.001 10/82
(12.2)
vs 1/444
(0.2)
37.9
(4.8-297)
<.001 1/24
(4.2)
vs 5/62
(8.1)
0.6
(0.1-5.4)
.67

Abbreviations: ACR, albumin-to-creatinine ratio; HR, hazard ratio; NA, not applicable.

a

The combined outcome was mortality or nonelective cardiovascular hospitalization; the combined outcome and mortality alone were each associated with albuminuria in the overall cohort.

b

Model 1 was based on automated forward selection and was adjusted for New York Heart Association functional class and cyanosis.

c

Model 2 was adjusted for age, diabetes mellitus, New York Heart Association functional class, cyanosis, congenital heart disease severity, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

d

Given the low absolute number of deaths (n = 17), multivariable adjustment was not performed for mortality alone.