Table 4.
Lag period 2 | Lag period 4 | Lag period 6 | Lag period 8 | Lag period 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOOD WASTE | |||||
ATE | β0 | β0 | β0 | β0 | β0 |
9.07 | 12.95* | – | 16.69** | 16.25** | |
Lag effect | β2 | β4 | β6 | β8 | β10 |
7.40* | 5.69 | – | 7,42† | 6.92 | |
Model test, F(4, 8) | 4.15* | 16.51** | – | 6.95* | 7.60** |
HOUSEHOLD WASTE | |||||
ATE | β0 | β0 | β0 | β0 | β0 |
−109.96* | −133.27* | – | −220.98* | −288.37** | |
Lag effect | β2 | β4 | β6 | β8 | β10 |
57.85 | 48.89 | – | 52.93 | 38.74 | |
Model test, F(4, 8) | 63.90** | 58.03** | – | 87.60** | 98.40** |
The coefficients have been estimated through a fixed effects panel data regression model, using robust standard errors clustered at the station level. We let
denote significance below 0.1,
a significance below 0.05 and
a significance below 0.01. The coefficients for lag period 6 could not be estimated because of multicollinearity.