Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 8;15(4):105–116. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4737

Table 2.

Comparison of two types of treatment plans

PTV Lungs Spinal Cord Heart Chest Wall
Plan Type CI HI D99(cGy) D95(cGy) D2(cGy) V5(%) V20(%) Dmean(cGy) Dmax(cGy) Dmean(cGy) D2(cGy) V30 D8cc(cGy)
Patient A Partial Arcs 0.562 0.0709 4789.1 4839.9 5134.6 32.1 8.46 578 481.3 73.7 622.5 58cc 4760.3
Whole Arc 0.583 0.073 4759.8 4802.3 5139.6 37.52 10.85 679.2 559.1 78 527.6 59.3cc 4782.5
Patient B Partial Arcs 0.513 0.0794 4145.4 4215.7 4488.6 46.98 14.39 891.4 594.3 723.2 1683.3 37.1cc 3760
Whole Arc 0.533 0.0769 4151.3 4210.4 4478 54.61 16.63 997.6 688.9 939.5 1910.3 39.2cc 3815.6

Dx=the dose tox%volume of tissue, as displayed on the DVH, unit: cGy; Vx=percentage of tissue receiving x Gy of radiation, unit: %; Dmax, mean: the max, mean dose to the tissue, unit: cGy; V30=how much volume of chest wall received30Gy; D8cc=the dose to8cc volume of chest wall, as displayed on the DVH, unit: (cGy); D8cc=a statistically significant risk factor for the development of rib fracture. (25)