Table 2.
P‐values of the Dice coefficients. The pairwise Student's t‐tests were between different algorithms for each target. P‐values were rounded to two significant digits, so a value of zero indicated a p‐value less than 0.005 and a significant difference between the two methods compared
| Bladder | Kidney | Liver Tumor | Duodenum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FKM vs. KHM | 0 | 0.11 | 0.69 | 0.51 |
| FKM vs. VR‐TPDS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KHM vs. VR‐TPDS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thresholding vs. RD‐LSE | 0 | 0.78 | ||
| Thresholding vs. FKM | 0.51 | 0 | ||
| Thresholding vs. KHM | 0.37 | 0 | ||
| Thresholding vs. VR‐TPDS | 0 | 0.63 | ||
| RD‐LSE vs. FKM | 0 | 0 | ||
| RD‐LSE vs. KHM | 0 | 0 | ||
| RD‐LSE vs. VR‐TPDS | 0 | 0.38 |