Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 29;18(5):117–123. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12137

Table 3.

Comparison of average dose parameters and volumes from the FB and DIBH treatment plans

FB DIBH
CTV
Dmean (Gy) 50.0 ± 0.0 50.0 ± 0.0
D98% (Gy) 47.0 ± 0.5 47.0 ± 0.5
V95% (%) 96.9 ± 1.1 96.9 ± 0.8
Volume (ml) 756.0 ± 400.7 759.4 ± 404.6
PTV
Dmedian (Gy) 49.8 ± 0.1 49.8 ± 0.1
D98% (Gy) 43.9 ± 3.6 45.8 ± 0.8
V95% (%) 92.2 ± 2.1 92.4 ± 2.1
Volume (ml) 956.3 ± 455.5 972.1 ± 467.4
Heart
Dmean (Gy) 3.0 ± 1.0 2.0 ± 0.9a
V25 Gy (%) 3.3 ± 1.7 1.0 ± 1.3a
Volume (ml) 625.7 ± 109.7 595.5 ± 87.8
LAD
Dmean (Gy) 28.1 ± 13.3 13.0 ± 11.4a
D2% (Gy) 43.7 ± 11.4 29.0 ± 17.2a
V20 Gy (%) 63.7 ± 30.0 24.4 ± 25.3a
Left lung
V20 Gy (%) 13.5 ± 2.5 13.3 ± 1.8
Volume (ml) 1283.1 ± 298.8 2098.2 ± 250.2a
a

Statistically significantly (P<0.05) different compared with FB.

FB, free‐breathing; DIBH, deep inspiration breath hold; CTV, clinical target volume; PTV, planning target volume; LAD, left ascending coronary artery; D98%, dose to 98% of target volume; V95%, volume of target receiving 95% of prescribed dose; V20/25 Gy, volume of organ receiving 20/25 Gy; D2%, maximum dose given to 2% of volume.