Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: Chembiochem. 2017 Nov 9;18(24):2380–2384. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201700397

Table 1.

Selectivity of BM3h variants for Ir(Me)-DPIX with respect to heme in minimal and rich mediaa

Variant M9 media
Ir(Me)-DPIX : hemeb
TB media
Ir(Me)-DPIX : hemeb
M9 yield Ir(Me)-DPIX
(mg/L)c
BM3h-T268A 95.0:5.0 ± 3.2 37.8:62.2 ± 3.6 6.8
BM3h-T268A/C400A 98.4:1.6 ± 2.2 80.2:19.8 ± 2.8 3.5
BM3h-T268A/C400G 99.5:0.5 ± 0.5 81.9:18.1 ± 6.2 4.1
WIVS-FM*-T268A 96.7:3.3 ± 2.1 51.8:48.2 ± 9.6 9.4
WIVS-FM*-T268A/C400A 99.7:0.3 ± 0.5 97.2:2.8 ± 1.1 11.5
WIVS-FM*-T268A/C400G >99.9:n.d. ± n/a 98.3:1.7 ± 1.5 14.3
a

All values reported are the average and standard deviations from three independent experiments.

b

Determined by HPLC analysis of purified proteins from expressions in the denoted media, reported as molar ratios.

c

Yields were determined via HPLC analysis or from absorbance spectra using ε402 nm = 107.7 mM−1cm−1