Table 2.
Intervention campus
|
Comparison campuses
|
Comparison campuses vs. Intervention
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population (n) | n = 28,034 | n = 64,635 | χ2 | df | p value (two-tailed) |
% female | 50.4% | 52.5% | 32.98 | 1 | <.00001 |
% non-White | 20.6% | 22.5% | 40.59 | 1 | <.00001 |
Violent crime | Crime rates per 1,000 studentsa | ||||
Forcible sexual offense | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.86 | 1 | ns |
Robbery | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 1 | ns |
Aggravated assault | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.62 | 1 | ns |
Burglary | 2.02 | 2.28 | 0.52 | 1 | ns |
Arrests | |||||
Weapons violation | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.39 | 1 | ns |
Drugs possession | 4.29 | 3.24 | 6.06 | 1 | .01 |
Liquor law violation | 0.56 | 1.40 | 11.88 | 1 | .0006 |
Source. The Campus Safety and Security Data Analysis Cutting Tool http://www.ope.ed.gov/security/.
Crime rates for 2010–2012 averaged across the 3 years (and weighted by the number of students enrolled at the two comparison universities).