Table 3.

Multivariable regression models for accommodative lag, accommodative variability (time domain [root mean square, RMS] the low-frequency component [LFC, 0-0.6Hz]) with independent variable uncorrected spherical equivalent hyperopia while adjusting for stimulus type (shapes or letters/text) and pupil size for all children.

		Passive (n = 54)			Active (n = 53)
		Beta-coeffient	95% CI	p-value	Beta-coeffient	95% CI	p-value
Accommodative Lag	Intercept	1.90	0.81–3.00	0.001	1.53	0.46–2.61	0.006
	Uncorrected Hyperopia	0.008	−0.11 to +0.13	0.896	−0.08	−0.19 to +0.02	0.118
	Stimuli	−0.11	−0.37 to +0.15	0.399	−0.11	−0.34 to +0.12	0.344
	Pupil Size	−0.05	−0.23 to +0.14	0.617	0.002	−0.17 to +0.18	0.981
RMS	Intercept	1.19	0.72–1.66	<0.001	0.93	0.62–1.25	<0.001
	Uncorrected Hyperopia	0.10	0.04–0.15	0.001	0.03	0.001–0.06	0.042
	Stimuli	−0.21	−0.32 to −0.10	<0.001	−0.07	−0.14 to −0.002	0.043
	Pupil Size	−0.08	−0.16 to −0.007	0.034	−0.09	−0.14 to −0.04	0.004
LFC	Intercept	3.7E-3	1.3E-3–6.1E-3	0.003	2.2E-3	1.1E-3–3.3E-3	<0.001
	Uncorrected Hyperopia	3.8E-4	1.1E-4–6.5E-4	0.006	1.2E-4	1.4E-5–2.3E-4	0.027
	Stimuli	−9.9E-4	−1.6E-3 to −4.2E-4	0.001	−2.4E-4	−4.8E-4 to −4.58E-6	0.046
	Pupil Size	−2.7E-4	−6.7E-4 to +1.3E-4	0.179	−0.26E-4	−4.4E-4 to −8.7E-5	0.004

RMS – Root mean square, LFC – Low-frequency component (0-0.6 hertz)

Significant P-values are reported in bold