. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2017 Nov 28;80(1):286–293. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27030

Table 1(b).

Qualitative comparison between GRASP and GROG-GRASP for two contrast-enhancement phases. No significant differences (P>0.05) between the two reconstruction schemes were found in all assessed categories.

		Overall Image Quality	Sharpness of Prostatic Capsule	Overall Artifact Level
Arterial Phase	GRASP	3.07±0.48	3.07±0.51	3.00±0.47
Arterial Phase	GROG-GRASP	3.05±0.47	3.10±0.52	3.02±0.51
Delayed Phase	GRASP	3.55±0.38	3.73±0.34	3.52±0.40
Delayed Phase	GROG-GRASP	3.52±0.40	3.69±0.40	3.50±0.42

Scoring criteria:

For overall image quality, 4=good, 3=adequate, 2=borderline, 1=non-diagnostic.

For sharpness of prostatic capsule, 4=good, 3=adequate, 2=partially seen, 1=not seen.

For overall artifacts level: 4=none, 3=mild, 2=significant, 1=unreadable