Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 Jan 15;25(3):168–173. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1419618

Table 3.

Carepartner Satisfaction (Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Acceptability) with CARE-CITE and Time to Review (n=6)

CARE-CITE MODULES TIME (minutes)
Mean (SD)
Usefulness (overall; text; video)
Mean (SD)
Ease of Use
Mean (SD)
Acceptability
Mean (SD)
Satisfaction Total
Mean (SD)
MOD I: Intro to CARE-CITE 5.80 (2.77) 3.80 (0.77) 3.80 (1.64) 4.00 (0.71) 3.84 (0.74)
MOD II: CIMT 11.00 (7.48) 4.53 (0.52) 4.80 (0.45) 4.60 (0.55) 4.60 (0.47)
MOD III: Practice/Goals 34.67 (21.43) 4.61 (0.50) 4.67 (0.52) 4.67 (0.52) 4.63 (0.34)
MOD IV: Autonomy Support 20.83 (11.21) 4.50 (0.51) 4.83 (0.41) 4.33 (0.52) 4.53 (0.39)
MOD V: CP Self-care 11.50 (4.23) 4.33(0.78) 4.83 (0.41) 4.33 (0.82) 4.46 (0.64)
MOD VI: SS Reflections 11.80 (4.32) 4.75 (0.45) 4.67 (0.52) 4.50 (0.55) 4.67 (0.30)
Average (SD) 15.93 (10.38) 4.42 (0.33) 4.60 (0.40) 4.41 (0.24) 4.45 (0.31)

Response scale: 1=Strongly disagree; 2= disagree; 3=neither agree/disagree; 4=agree;, 5=strongly agree

©Tamilyn Bakas, 2009. Used and modified with permission. Requests for the Satisfaction Scale and scoring instructions can be made to Tamilyn Bakas, University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, PO Box 210038 Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0038 tamilyn.bakas@uc.edu