Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 6;55(4):1314–1324. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3042-0

Table 1.

Sample code and compare means of interaction of temperature, time and starch type on size, zeta potential, PDI, EE and LE of nanoparticles

Starch Temp (°C) Time (min) Sample code Size Zeta potential PDI LE (%) EE (%)
Corn 0 5 CSN-0-5 38.3 ± 0.66b − 19.6 ± 0.4d 0.33 ± 0.25d 22.34 ± 1.2g 1.09 ± 2.3e
10 CSN-0-10 32.04 ± 0.45a − 17.59 ± 0.46e 0.343 ± 0.37d 61.07 ± 1.4d 2.98 ± 1.8c
15 5 CSN-15-5 60.18 ± 1.2f − 8.49 ± 0.73h 0.299 ± 0.35c 28.44 ± 0.98f 2.04 ± 1.9d
10 CSN-15-10 40.33 ± 1.4c − 13.58 ± 0.83f 0.382 ± 0.67e 46.7 ± e 0.76 2.22 ± 2.5d
Potato 0 5 PSN-0-5 66.1 ± 0.87 g − 33.39 ± 1.3a 0.214 ± 1.8b 87 ± 1.7b 3.67 ± 1.7c
10 PSN-0-10 54.9 ± 0.56d − 31.83 ± 1.5b 0.173 ± 0.29a 94.71 ± 2.1a 5.07 ± 0.18a
15 5 PSN-15-5 99.2 ± 0.91h − 22.96 ± 1.7c 0.208 ± 0.9b 94.8 ± 1.4a 5.8 ± 2.1a
10 PSN-15-10 57.1 ± 1.1e − 10.98 ± 0.88g 0.164 ± 0.8a 85.9 ± 1.6c 4.37 ± 2.1b

Different letters show significant differences in 95% confidence

Sample code is illustrated as x–y–z in which x, y and z mean starch sources, temperature (°C) and time (min), respectively