Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 29;8:5354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23705-8

Figure 3.

Figure 3

CoM energy change during propulsion (open symbols) and collision (closed symbols) for the Pro-Flex foot (panel a) and the Vari-Flex foot (panel b) compared with energy absorbed by the foot/ankle complex (closed symbols) and returned/generated (open symbols) by the Pro-Flex foot (panel c) and the Vari-Flex foot (panel d). Data trends for the amputated limb (solid black line) and the sound limb (dashed blue line) show that the storage and return of energy in the passive prosthetic is more constant than the sound limb across terrains, the Pro-Flex foot does return more energy than the Vari-Flex foot, and the CoM energy change during propulsion is larger with the Pro-Flex foot. Error bars represent ± one standard deviation.