Table 1.
Comparison | Accuracy (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class A | Class B | (Classes A+B)/2 | Class A | Class B | p-value | |
Intra-block leave-one-trial-out | ||||||
Passive elicitation | Positive | Neutral | 85.41 ± 14.43 | 84.08 ± 18.25 | 86.73 ± 13.13 | <0.001 |
Negative | Neutral | 81.53 ± 16.05 | 78.37 ± 21.92 | 84.69 ± 13.86 | <0.001 | |
Positive | Negative | 58.37 ± 15.86 | 57.14 ± 20.00 | 59.59 ± 19.36 | 0.007 | |
Active elicitation | Positive | Neutral | 89.80 ± 13.84 | 88.16 ± 16.29 | 91.43 ± 13.23 | <0.001 |
Negative | Neutral | 91.53 ± 13.04 | 89.80 ± 17.85 | 93.27 ± 10.49 | <0.001 | |
Positive | Negative | 45.10 ± 21.32 | 44.08 ± 23.09 | 46.12 ± 24.90 | 1.000 | |
Inter-block cross-validation | ||||||
Passive x Active elicitation | Positive | Neutral | 56.94 ± 21.77 | 50.20 ± 26.18 | 63.67 ± 24.55 | 0.364 |
Negative | Neutral | 54.69 ± 22.72 | 44.90 ± 29.59 | 64.49 ± 25.34 | 1.000 | |
Positive | Negative | 50.82 ± 13.82 | 53.47 ± 34.73 | 48.16 ± 32.89 | 1.000 | |
Active x Passive elicitation | Positive | Neutral | 50.10 ± 16.19 | 42.04 ± 25.25 | 58.16 ± 18.56 | 1.000 |
Negative | Neutral | 55.92 ± 18.33 | 50.61 ± 29.75 | 61.22 ± 19.43 | 0.341 | |
Positive | Negative | 50.41 ± 14.28 | 44.08 ± 34.39 | 56.73 ± 33.75 | 1.000 | |
Inter-block leave-one-trial-out | ||||||
Neutral | 83.27 ± 12.19 | 84.90 ± 13.09 | 81.63 ± 14.63 | <0.001 | ||
Negative | Active elicitation | Passive elicitation | 72.86 ± 17.91 | 70.61 ± 24.19 | 75.10 ± 18.50 | <0.001 |
Positive | 75.71 ± 17.68 | 77.55 ± 19.85 | 73.88 ± 20.90 | <0.001 |
The first and third configurations were analyzed using the leave-one-trial-out (LOTO) method (intra-block and inter-block LOTO, respectively), while the second configuration (inter-block cross-validation) was trained using data from either the active or passive elicitation condition and tested with data from the remaining condition. Significant accuracies (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.