Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 23;5(1):22. doi: 10.3390/vetsci5010022

Table 6.

Best model explaining ESBL-E occurrence in poultry, pig and cow production (including all territories), 2016−2017.

Dependent Variables Independent Variables Adj. OR (CI95%) p-Value AIC
Broiler occurrence (a) Distance elev oth species >500 m 3.18 (0.65–15.56) 0.15 93.68
Distance elev oth species <500 m 0.99 (0.26–4.39) 0.99
Foot bath at room entrance 5.89 (0.61–57.17) 0.13
Water quality control 0.12 (0.02–0.82) 0.03
Water storage tank 2.58 (0.85–7.79) 0.09
Pig occurrence * (b) Farmers visits 14.15 (1.17–171.35) 0.04 65.09
Soak the floor 22.34 (1.51–330.98) 0.02
Detergent use for cleaning 0.12 (0.02–0.75) 0.02
Antibiotic use recently (<1 year) 8.82 (1.09–71.4) 0.04
Beef cattle occurrence (c) Livestock size > 25 0.07 (0.02–0.28) <0.001 83.53
Antibiotic drug use recently (<1 year) 3.94 (1.04–14.98) 0.04
Disinfestation 0.19 (0.04–0.91) 0.04
Clearing space around the building 0.22 (0.04–1.29) 0.09
Water storage tank 0.38 (0.11–1.35) 0.14
Pet presence 6.87 (1.13–41.67) 0.04

* Reunion and Madagascar only, (a) Intercept = 0.01376, null deviance: 99.832, model d.f. = 4; (b) Intercept = −2.7919, null deviance: 73.304, model d.f. = 3; (c) Intercept = 0.9959, null deviance: 132.027, model d.f. = 5.