Table 5.
Performances of the proposed method before and after post-processing for different when n = 21 using the DigitalGlobe data.
| Before P.P. | After P.P. | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPR | FPR | OA | Kappa | TPR | FPR | OA | Kappa | |
| 0.50 | 0.8344 | 0.1770 | 0.8263 | 0.6082 | 0.9171 | 0.1427 | 0.8739 | 0.7110 |
| 0.55 | 0.7915 | 0.1170 | 0.8543 | 0.6660 | 0.8921 | 0.1114 | 0.8896 | 0.7444 |
| 0.60 | 0.7265 | 0.0752 | 0.8568 | 0.6721 | 0.8708 | 0.0974 | 0.8931 | 0.7518 |
| 0.65 | 0.7408 | 0.0626 | 0.8702 | 0.7015 | 0.8791 | 0.0902 | 0.9007 | 0.7686 |
| 0.70 | 0.6823 | 0.0683 | 0.8421 | 0.6416 | 0.8079 | 0.0650 | 0.8941 | 0.7539 |
| 0.75 | 0.5996 | 0.0562 | 0.8088 | 0.5753 | 0.6941 | 0.0666 | 0.8483 | 0.6547 |
| 0.80 | 0.5619 | 0.0463 | 0.7929 | 0.5465 | 0.6551 | 0.0438 | 0.8435 | 0.6466 |
| 0.85 | 0.4069 | 0.0405 | 0.6878 | 0.3698 | 0.5255 | 0.0456 | 0.7713 | 0.5066 |
| 0.90 | 0.3302 | 0.0341 | 0.6192 | 0.2783 | 0.4152 | 0.0451 | 0.6929 | 0.3758 |