Table 6.
Average performances of different methods using the DigitalGlobe dataset.
| OA | Kappa | TPR | FPR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method in [13] | 0.8381 | 0.6048 | 0.8094 | 0.1522 |
| Method in [15] | 0.8264 | 0.4828 | 0.4900 | 0.0602 |
| Method in [16] | 0.8459 | 0.5944 | 0.6545 | 0.0760 |
| VWRD [23] | 0.8872 ± 0.0054 | 0.7600 ± 0.0023 | 0.8560± 0.0042 | 0.0876 ± 0.0037 |
| PCA + SVM | 0.8755 ± 0.0042 | 0.7535 ± 0.0056 | 0.8528 ± 0.0038 | 0.0901 ± 0.0053 |
| DCNNs + SVM | 0.8889 ± 0.0035 | 0.7766 ± 0.0061 | 0.8970 ± 0.0025 | 0.0845 ± 0.0036 |
| CNN-2 [36] | 0.8046 ± 0.0028 | 0.5244 ± 0.0037 | 0.7046 ± 0.0025 | 0.1648 ± 0.0033 |
| Proposed method | 0.9212 ± 0.0016 | 0.7998 ± 0.0015 | 0.9100 ± 0.0017 | 0.0751 ± 0.0026 |