Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2018 Feb;10(1):326–356. doi: 10.1257/pol.20160319

Table 3. Comparison of Migrant Cardiologists to Nonmigrants.

Census region Geographya Years since cardiology fellowshipb Female US born




% out % in Migrants Nonmigrants Migrants Non-migrants Migrants Non-migrants


p25 Median p75 p25 Median p75
Northeast 10.7% 8.9% 4 8 16 8 15 21 11.5% 6.9% 65.3% 72.0%
Midwest 18.3% 15.2% 4 8 16 8 14 21 7.5% 5.7% 53.2% 64.1%
South 14.5% 15.6% 4 8 14 7 13 20 7.4% 4.8% 57.0% 67.5%
West 9.0% 13.5% 4 8 16 8 15 22 7.1% 7.1% 59.8% 64.2%
Total 13.5% 13.5% 4 8 15 8 14 21 8.1% 5.8% 57.7% 67.4%

Notes:

a

The geography comparison describes the fraction of emigrants (percentage out) and immigrants (percentage in) to total cardiologists in each region, weighted by total patients each physician treated in that region from 1998–2012. These totals are slightly less than the fraction of sample cardiologists moving between 1998–2012 (15.5 percent; see Table 1) since some nonmigrants practice in multiple hospitals across regional boundaries.

b

Years-since-fellowship for migrants is defined as the time between year of move and cardiology fellowship completion. For nonmigrants, years-since-fellowship is defined as the time between a given patient's admission date and the cardiologist's fellowship completion date. Statistics are calculated over physician-patient pairs, and region is that of hospital admission.