Table 3. Summary of Findings and Strength of Evidence for LAMA as Add-on Therapy to Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) and LABA vs ICS and LABA (Control).
Outcome | Included Studies | ICS and LABA + LAMA | Control | Resultsa | Strength of Evidenced | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of Participants | Outcome Datab | No. of Participants | Outcome Dataa | Absolute Risk Difference (95% CI)c | Effect Size (95% CI) | |||
Exacerbations | ||||||||
Requiring systemic corticosteroids | 18,22 | 710 | 125 | 589 | 150 | −0.5 (−8.1 to 7.0) | RR, 0.84 (0.57 to 1.22) | Moderate |
Requiring hospitalizationc | Trial 118 | 237 | 8 | 222 | 10 | −1.1 (−5.1 to 2.6) | RR, 0.75 (0.30 to 1.86) | Moderate |
Trial 218 | 216 | 8 | 232 | 10 | −0.6 (−4.5 to 3.3) | RR, 0.86 (0.35 to 2.14) | ||
Asthma worseninge | 18,22 | 710 | 259 | 589 | 312 | −10.2 (−21.5 to 1.2) | RR, 0.78 (0.72 to 0.86) | High |
Death | ||||||||
All-cause | 18,22 | 710 | 0 | 589 | 0 | No deaths occurred | Insufficient | |
Asthma-specific | 18,22 | 710 | 0 | 589 | 0 | No deaths occurred | Insufficient | |
Asthma Control | ||||||||
ACQ-5 responderf | 26 | 453 | NR | 454 | NR | OR, 1.42 (1.08 to 1.86) | Low | |
ACQ-6 scoref | 28 | 256 | 1.23 (0.80) | 132 | 1.14 (0.79) | MD, 0.09 (−0.08 to 0.25) | Low | |
ACQ-6 responderf | 28 | 257 | 191 | 135 | 100 | 0.2 (−8.5 to 9.6) | RR, 1.00 (0.88 to 1.12) | Low |
ACQ-7 scoref | 26,28 | 711 | 590 | MD, −0.07 (−0.31 to 0.18) | Moderate | |||
ACQ-7 respondera,f | 26 | 453 | 263 | 454 | 205 | 12.9 (6.4 to 19.3) | RR, 1.28 (1.13 to 1.46) | |
28 | 257 | 190 | 135 | 99 | 0.6 (−8.2 to 10.1) | RR, 1.01 (0.89 to 1.14) | Moderate | |
Spirometry | ||||||||
FEV1 peak, L | 26,28 | 709 | 586 | MD, 0.11 (0.00 to 0.22) | Moderate | |||
FEV1 trough, L | 26,28 | 709 | 586 | MD, 0.07 (0.01 to 0.14) | Moderate | |||
FEV1 AUC, L | 26,28 | 709 | 586 | MD, 0.10 (0.01 to 0.19) | High | |||
FVC peak, L | 26,28 | 709 | 586 | MD, 0.11 (0.05 to 0.17) | High | |||
FVC trough, L | 26,28 | 709 | 586 | MD, 0.09 (0.03 to 0.15) | High | |||
FVC AUC, L | 26,28 | 709 | 586 | MD, 0.10 (0.04 to 0.17) | High | |||
Asthma-Related Quality of Life | ||||||||
AQLQ scorea,g | Trial 126 | 237 | 5.15 (0.89) | 222 | 5.11 (0.89) | MD, 0.04 (−0.13 to 0.20) | High | |
Trial 226 | 216 | 5.09 (0.91) | 232 | 4.95 (0.91) | MD, 0.14 (−0.03 to 0.31) | |||
AQLQ responderg | 26 | 453 | 212 | 454 | 192 | 4.5 (−2.0 to 10.9) | RR, 1.11 (0.96 to 1.28) | Moderate |
Health Resource Utilization | ||||||||
Rescue medication use, puffs/24h | 26,28 | 707 | 585 | MD, −0.12 (−0.42 to 0.17) | Moderate |
Abbreviations: ACQ, Asthma Control Questionnaire; AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; AUC, area under the curve; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist; MD, mean difference; NR, not reported, OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk.
Meta-analyses were performed when ≥3 studies reported the same outcome. When data were available for ≤2 studies, the results from each study are individually shown. For continuous outcomes, the mean value represents the mean change from baseline (change score) for each study group and the MD represents the difference in change scores (change from baseline) between the LAMA and control groups.
Data are presented as either number of participants with an event (for dichotomous end points) or mean (SD) value (for continuous end points).
Data are presented as absolute risk differences (risk in LAMA group minus risk in control group) between groups.
The strength of evidence for each study was based on 5 domains (risk of bias, consistency, directness, precision, and publication bias) and categorized as high, moderate, low, or insufficient (eAppendix B in the Supplement).
Defined by studies as a progressive increase in asthma symptoms compared with day-to-day symptoms or a decrease in morning peak expiratory flow of ≥30% for ≥2 d.