Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 15;20(4):307–313. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0036

Table 2. Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scores of Studies Analyzed.

Source Mean (SD) Cohort Size, No.
Barham et al,17 2015
Change in score for entire samplea −30.25 (25.33) 41
Change in score for cephalic turn-in maneuver −29.73 (23.05) 25
Change in score for costal cartilage grafts −31.25 (25.33) 16
Chambers et al,18 2015
Baseline score 75.7 (20.1) 40
Score at 2 mo 31.4 (27.2) 40
Score at 4 mo 34.0 (19.8) 40
Score at 6 mo 22.1 (18.8) 40
Deroee et al,19 2011
Change in score −40.4 (7.9) 12
Egan and Kim,16 2005
Baseline score 67.1 (10.4) 6
Postoperative score 18.6 (14.6 6
Score at 3 mo 21.4 (15.2) 6
Lindsay,4 2012
Entire sample
Baseline score 66.42 (20.25) 60
Score at 1-3 mo 21.85 (20.68) 54
Score at 6-12 mo 22.33 (23.05) 45
Internal nasal valve
Baseline score 61.79 (23.34) 14
Score at 1-3 mo 13.46 (19.19) 13
Score at 6-12 mo 4.09 (7.35) 11
External nasal valve
Baseline score 59.69 (20.69) 16
Score 1-3 mo 22.69 (15.22) 13
Score 6-12 mo 18.85 (17.34) 13
Both valves
Baseline score 72.17 (17.30) 30
Score at 1-3 mo 25.36 (22.93) 28
Score at 6-12 mo 34.05 (25.03) 21
Palesy et al,20 2015
Change in score −30.53 (26.14) 19
Rhee et al,21 2005
Baseline score 68.9 (20.9) 20
Score at 3 mo 20.7 (19.5) 14
Score at 6 mo 15.8 (18.2) 20
Roofe and Most,22 2007
Baseline score 65.0 (7.6) 8
Score at 6 mo 19.0 (18.9) 8
Change in 4 mob −46.0 (16.53) 42
Sufyan et al 2012c
Tan and Rotenberg,24 2012d
Baseline score 86.5 (8.0) 15
Score at 11 mo 26.5 (11.5) 15
Yeung et al,25 2016b
Change at 3 mo for entire sample −48.6 (29.93) 79
Change at 3 mo for functional −51.4 (26.42) 31
Change at 3 mo for aesthetic-functional −46.6 (33.58) 48
a

Standard deviation adopted from reported postoperative standard deviation (costal cartilage grafts group).

b

Standard deviations were calculated from reported 95% confidence intervals.

c

No data needed for effect size calculation reported.

d

The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores are reported on a 20-point scale; thus, the scores were multiplied by 5.