Table 3.
Summary of the results obtained in relation to the tested mediation models.
| Coefficients | Model 1 a | Model 2 b |
|---|---|---|
| Model fit indeces | ||
| Chi-square | 177.128 | 58.752 |
| Degrees of freedom | 73 | 31 |
| CFI | 0.94 | 0.97 |
| TLI | 0.92 | 0.94 |
| RMSEA | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| RMSRwithin | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| RMSRbetween | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| Path | ||
| SSMC-SAWB | 0.069 * | 0.066 * |
| SAWB > EAWB | 0.211 ns | 0.438 ns |
| SSMC > PWE | 0.712 *** | 0.342 ns |
| SSMC > EAWB | −0.171 ns | −0.227 ns |
| PWE > EAWB (Level 1 estimate) | 0.705 *** | 1.303 *** |
| PWE > EAWB (Level 2 estimate) | 1.012 *** | 0.616 * |
a In Model 1, the psychosocial work environment was operationalized by using work context factors (supervisor and peer support, role, relationships, and change). b In Model 2, the psychosocial work environment was operationalized by using job content factors (demand and control). SSMC = supervisor stress management competence; SAWB = supervisor affective well-being; EAWB = employee affective well-being; PWE = psychosocial work environment. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. CFI: Comparative Fit Index; TLI: Tucker-Lewis Index.